[Groop]Re: Is there anybody out there?

[Dan Coakley]

I'm here, but I'm ignoring you.

Did someone say something?



> Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 22:51:41 -0700
> From: Ruben Arellano <rarellano@shaw.ca>
> Subject: Re: [Groop]Re: Is there anybody out there?
> To: Denis Hackney <dhackney@optusnet.com.au>
> Cc: Groo mailing list <groop@groo.com>
> Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
> <3CD0C9FE.3080905@shaw.ca>
> <3CD0CC09.9933B620@optusnet.com.au>
> <3CD0CD17.4000909@shaw.ca>
> <3CD0CE67.E6E8272F@optusnet.com.au>
> 
> Denis Hackney wrote:
> 
> >Ruben Arellano wrote:
> >
> >>Denis Hackney wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ruben Arellano wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Charles L. Klein wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Chris Schechner wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>"Fitzwilliam Darcy" <slowofmind@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Is there anybody out there? Hello - Hello -
> Hello!
> >>>>>>>Is there anybody out there?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>Nope, nobody here!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>Nope, no one here either.
> >>>>>
> >>>>Sorry, not here.  Check over there.
> >>>>
> >>>Over here?  Yeah, there's someone over here -
> just over... next to
> >>>the... or was it... uh...
> >>>Hmm.  Sorry, my mistake - that was just a shadow.
>  Nobody here
> >>>either.
> >>>
> >>Now, I'm pretty sure there was somebody just over
> there.... Check
> >>again.
> >>
> >
> >OK, I'll check, but I don't think I'll find anyone
> - there hasn't been
> >anyone over here for quite some time...
> >
> >See?  These footprints here show that there was
> someone here, but
> >they're all overgrown with weeds, so it's been ages
> since anyone was
> >here.
> >
> Alright, if you say so.  No, wait, those aren't
> weeds!  Omigosh!  Those 
> are giant.... oh... no, you're right.  They're just
> weeds.  Sorry for 
> all the hullaballoo.  


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com