[Groop] Re: Top Posters

Sat Apr 9 08:45:15 PDT 2005

Yes, I agree that NO ONE would do that. 

-----Original Message-----
From: groop-bounces at groo.com [mailto:groop-bounces at groo.com] On Behalf Of
Chad Riden
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:10 PM
To: cklein at mn.rr.com; groop at groo.com
Subject: Re: RE: [Groop] Re: Top Posters

Posting just to pad your count? Ridiculous.

Chad Riden
www.ChadRiden.com
www.MangyDog.com
www.NashvilleStandUp.com

-----Original Message-----
    From: "cklein at mn.rr.com"<cklein at mn.rr.com>
    Sent: 4/8/05 3:23:43 PM
    To: "'groop-groo.com'"<groop at groo.com>
    Subject: Re: RE: [Groop] Re: Top Posters

    I believe that's when the majority of all posts are done.  Usually in
January, but this year in April.  Not that I would stoop so low as to pad my
count just discussing it, though...

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: promethea <promethea at kc.rr.com>
    Date: Friday, April 8, 2005 2:57 pm
    Subject: RE: [Groop] Re: Top Posters

    > Good thing that gratuitous message count padding in the weeks 
    > following the
    > release of 'top posters' is still allowed ;)

    _______________________________________________
    Groop mailing list
    Groop at groo.com
    http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop

_______________________________________________
Groop mailing list
Groop at groo.com
http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop