[Groop] Groo member cards

[Chris Schechner]

To me, all this talk about having two different levels of Groop cards is
kind of silly. I¹ve been a Groop member for a long time. I¹ve been a Groo
fan for a long time. I¹m not as fanatical as many of you. But it seems to me
that those who want to differentiate between old members and new members are
just trying to build themselves up somehow. For cryin¹ out loud, it¹s just
the Groop! If you¹re that insecure, you¹re in big trouble. If there are
enough people that want cards and if Gary wants to mess with it, well then
why not just do another run of the things and not worry about rank? I¹m glad
for everyone who¹s in the Groop. Tone is pretty new and he¹s added an awful
lot. Newbies are just as valuable as ... uh... is oldbies a word? Okay,
that¹s my two kopins.

Love and kisses,
Glorko (The other Chris)

BTW, Gary, I¹ve got a couple of goodies I¹ll be snail mailing you.


on 7/22/06 9:53 PM, Ryan Simmons at onewhowatches at msn.com wrote:

> I thought I had already made an email about this...but well...it dissapeared
> or something.
> 
> Should there even be a differentation in the cards?  Numeralizing them is
> fine.  But creating series?  Like first class groopy versus second class
> groopy?  Does the card represent a Groop member or Groo fan?
> 
> snip (for Rick)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.newdream.net/pipermail/groop/attachments/20060722/05070b20/attachment.html