[Groop] Groop Dumb Old Groo-Grams

[Rick Loomis]

At 08:13 PM 3/9/06, you wrote:
>From: Larry Steller <mrgrooism at yahoo.com>
>Subject: [Groop] Dumb old GrooGrams!
>To: groop at groo.com
>Message-ID: <20060310002121.52135.qmail at web30007.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1


>OK, so a number of us here have had some GrooGrams published over the
>years. Let's hear about some of yours.
>
>1) First, let's take nominations for the dumbest, most pointless
>GrooGram ever published from a member of The Groop. I think I may be a
>shoe-in, but let's see if anyone else's is dumber and more pointless.
>After nominations are in we'll vote on them!


><snip>


>2) Also, which of us active in the Groop now can cite the EARLIEST
>GrooGram published?
>
>3) How about the MOST GrooGrams published (again, active Groop)?

(sigh) How about the most letters written, in the hopes of getting 
published, and never getting one published, no matter how clever they were?
Rick
(not a Pirate)