[Groop] Groopedia Spam?

[Mo orst]

Since Groopedia is separate from Wikipedia, perhaps it should remain a more static site where corrections and info are submitted for review instead of posted immediately.

Otherwise, keep text copies of your corrections so that fixing their sabotage is facilitated with as few cut and paste maneuvers as possible. Then just be diligent.

It's always a war of attrition with this stuff. Just like history. 


-Al





> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:25:04 -0800
> From: GaryG at DOR.WA.GOV
> To: keith at madmunki.com; groop at groo.com
> Subject: Re: [Groop] Groopedia Spam?
> 
> Hey Guys!
> 
> We have several certifiable computer geniuses in the Groop, including
> Groo.com & Groopedia creator Josh Jones.  I would think someone could
> figure out a way to stop these jerks. (Personally, I wish there was a
> way to "Groo" their computers!)  
> 
> Gary G. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: groop-bounces at groo.com [mailto:groop-bounces at groo.com] On Behalf
> Of Keith Smith
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 4:04 PM
> To: groop at groo.com
> Subject: [Groop] Groopedia Spam?
> 
> Can anything be done about the Groopedia spammers C4tbaStaal &
> Vic4tLiboc?
> 
> I have cleaned up the site a couple of times just for it to get spammed
> again by these two.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Groop mailing list
> Groop at groo.com
> http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop
> _______________________________________________
> Groop mailing list
> Groop at groo.com
> http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.newdream.net/pipermail/groop/attachments/20090209/9ad31edf/attachment-0001.htm>