<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [Groop] Intense debate - NOT political, I promise</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'>Walt Kelly once posited:<BR>
<BR>
How much ground round would a ground hog hog if a ground hog could hog ground round?<BR>
<BR>
Please don’t start another discussion trying to answer this.<BR>
<BR>
Chris<BR>
(Glorko)<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
on 11/2/08 1:58 AM, Eric Chun at ericchun@hotmail.com wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'>Woodchucks are also known as groundhogs, so ...<BR>
<BR>
How much ground could a groundhog grind,<BR>
if a groundhog could grind ground?<BR>
<BR>
If you have a circle, a "radian" is an arc measure<BR>
equal to the radius of the circle. As a result, if<BR>
you were to measure the circumference of the<BR>
circle in terms of "radians" (or the radius of the<BR>
circle), then the circumference turns out to be:<BR>
<BR>
2 * (radius) * ("pi")<BR>
<BR>
"pi" turns out to be an irrational number, approx-<BR>
imately 3.1415927.<BR>
<BR>
22/7 is close, approximately 3.1428571.<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>