[Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35

[Steve Hubbell]

The neat thing about the wiki is that it saves all previous versions in the page's "history", so correcting  any spam attacks or tampering is fairly easy. It is just frustrating at how frequently that it needs to be fixed.
 
 
 
> From: m00rst at hotmail.com> To: groop at groo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:50:47 -0600> Subject: Re: [Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35> > As long as files containing the copy from quality contributions are saved, > they can always be re-uploaded when tampering is spotted.> > Perhaps we could keep copies at the TWFGroo forum so that the burden of > replacing them when needed is shared with all who are interested. Plus, > members of the forum could offer revisions and enjoy it as a sort of > continuously evolving product of the Groo fan community.> > -Al> > > > > >From: elie at harriett.us> >To: groop at groo.com> >Subject: Re: [Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35> >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:15:33 -0700> >> >Unfortunately, both the blessing and the curse of the wiki is the same: > >anyone (usually) can edit it. Look at Wikipedia, for example. One of the > >most comprehensive sources of knowledge on the planet right now is > >Wikipedia. It was written by average people like us. Not to say it > >doesn't have many mistakes......BOY does it have mistakes! But it's a good > >starting point for knowledge about----everything.> >> >By the way, anyone able to further flesh out Sergio and ME's entries on > >Wikipedia? Stan Sakai's bio is pretty thin. And except for a mention > >about Groo, Tom Luth's entry is nonexistent. Our Groo Crew needs more!> >> >Did someone here start those? We should have more info on these guys up > >there!> >> >Elie> >> >> >> >> >> >> >-------- Original Message --------> >> >Subject: Re: [Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35> >> >From: "Gary Grossmann" <grossfamm at comcast.net>> >> >Date: Wed, October 24, 2007 9:31 am> >> >To: <groop at groo.com>> >> >> >> >OK Josh and You Groopie Techies!> >> >> >> >I'm ignorant on such things, but you all have got to set up Groopedia so> >> >that either it cannot be vandalized or if it is you can track down the bozo> >> >and cyber-nuke him or something. This has been an ongoing problem and it's> >> >ridicules! Surely there are ways to prevent it.> >> >> >> >-Gary G.> >> >> >> >> >> >----- Original Message -----> >> >From: "Stefan Anderson" <SAnderson at divex.co.uk>> >> >To: <groop at groo.com>> >> >Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:28 AM> >> >Subject: Re: [Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35> >> >> >> >> >> > > Someone has done it again. Lots of dodgy links in the links part of the> >> > > main page.> >> > >> >> > > Cheers> >> > >> >> > > stefan> >> >> >> >> > > >_______________________________________________> >Groop mailing list> >Groop at groo.com> >http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop> > > _______________________________________________> Groop mailing list> Groop at groo.com> http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop
_________________________________________________________________
Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare!
http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.newdream.net/pipermail/groop/attachments/20071025/54d7d633/attachment.htm