[Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35

[Mo orst]

Ah... good to know that about wikipedia.

I wonder what the deal is with the vandal? Is sombody mad they didn't get 
printed in Groo Grams?

>
>
>The neat thing about the wiki is that it saves all previous versions in the 
>page's "history", so correcting  any spam attacks or tampering is fairly 
>easy. It is just frustrating at how frequently that it needs to be fixed.
>
>
>
> > From: m00rst at hotmail.com> To: groop at groo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 
>22:50:47 -0600> Subject: Re: [Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35> > As 
>long as files containing the copy from quality contributions are saved, > 
>they can always be re-uploaded when tampering is spotted.> > Perhaps we 
>could keep copies at the TWFGroo forum so that the burden of > replacing 
>them when needed is shared with all who are interested. Plus, > members of 
>the forum could offer revisions and enjoy it as a sort of > continuously 
>evolving product of the Groo fan community.> > -Al> > > > > >From: 
>elie at harriett.us> >To: groop at groo.com> >Subject: Re: [Groop] Groop Digest, 
>Vol 56, Issue 35> >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:15:33 -0700> >> 
> >Unfortunately, both the blessing and the curse of the wiki is the same: > 
> >anyone (usually) can edit it. Look at Wikipedia, for example. One of the 
> > >most comprehensive sources of knowledge on the planet right now is > 
> >Wikipedia. It was written by average people like us. Not to say it > 
> >doesn't have many mistakes......BOY does it have mistakes! But it's a 
>good > >starting point for knowledge about----everything.> >> >By the way, 
>anyone able to further flesh out Sergio and ME's entries on > >Wikipedia? 
>Stan Sakai's bio is pretty thin. And except for a mention > >about Groo, 
>Tom Luth's entry is nonexistent. Our Groo Crew needs more!> >> >Did someone 
>here start those? We should have more info on these guys up > >there!> >> 
> >Elie> >> >> >> >> >> >> >-------- Original Message --------> >> >Subject: 
>Re: [Groop] Groop Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35> >> >From: "Gary Grossmann" 
><grossfamm at comcast.net>> >> >Date: Wed, October 24, 2007 9:31 am> >> >To: 
><groop at groo.com>> >> >> >> >OK Josh and You Groopie Techies!> >> >> >> >I'm 
>ignorant on such things, but you all have got to set up Groopedia so> >> 
> >that either it cannot be vandalized or if it is you can track down the 
>bozo> >> >and cyber-nuke him or something. This has been an ongoing problem 
>and it's> >> >ridicules! Surely there are ways to prevent it.> >> >> >> 
> >-Gary G.> >> >> >> >> >> >----- Original Message -----> >> >From: "Stefan 
>Anderson" <SAnderson at divex.co.uk>> >> >To: <groop at groo.com>> >> >Sent: 
>Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:28 AM> >> >Subject: Re: [Groop] Groop 
>Digest, Vol 56, Issue 35> >> >> >> >> >> > > Someone has done it again. 
>Lots of dodgy links in the links part of the> >> > > main page.> >> > >> >> 
> > > Cheers> >> > >> >> > > stefan> >> >> >> >> > > 
> >_______________________________________________> >Groop mailing list> 
> >Groop at groo.com> >http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop> 
> > > _______________________________________________> Groop mailing list> 
>Groop at groo.com> http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop
>_________________________________________________________________
>Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare!
>http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews


>_______________________________________________
>Groop mailing list
>Groop at groo.com
>http://mailman.newdream.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/groop