[Groop] Not OT.

Dustin grinningdemon at comcast.net
Fri Dec 12 02:39:01 PST 2008


Since we are being honest here, I'll go ahead and make people mad by saying
I like Groo better when he was solo (no dog). Don't get me wrong, I love
every issue of Groo and will be reading/buying until the end. I just know my
most favorite issues are all of them before Rufferto came along.

 

You also have to think about how old you are and how you see things now. I
was 12 when I bought my first Groo (Epic #8) and you are lying if you say
you are as excited to see a new Groo now as you were a new Groo back then. 

 

Here is an easier way to put it... Indiana Jones 4 sucked. Would it still
have sucked if it came out when you were the same age as Raiders or Temple
of Doom? Probably a hell of a lot less. I loved Temple of Doom, but I'm not
so sure I'd love it if my fist time seeing it was right now.

 

-          Dustin

 

 

From: groop-bounces at groo.com [mailto:groop-bounces at groo.com] On Behalf Of Mo
orst
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:53 AM
To: groop at groo.com
Subject: [Groop] Not OT.

 

I've got some questions for some of you fine folks. I realize that ME is a
part of the list, which is great... but it seems there are certain things we
don't discuss here because of his presence. Perhaps he can skip this thread
altogether.
 
1. I'm wondering what some of your actual opinions are regarding the quality
of the Groo stories since the guys moved to Dark Horse. Compared in
particular to the Epic run. Am I the only one who sees them as heavy handed
and not as fun as "classic" Groo?
 
2. How do you rate the 4-part stories against the old stand alone issues?
What are the plusses/minuses of either format?
 
-Al  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.newdream.net/pipermail/groop/attachments/20081212/1647a5e3/attachment.htm>


More information about the Groop mailing list